Human Connection and a New Reformation

Copyright by Shea Oakley
All rights reserved

Relationship is at the core of the Christian life. This should not be surprising as the God we worship is a Trinity, living eternally in relationship within the Godhead. As creatures made in God’s image we are utterly relational beings and apart from life-giving bonds with God and with each other we die, both emotionally and spiritually.

Today even the most basic human connections are unraveling at an alarming pace. In the West we have created the most alienated culture in human history. Radical individualism has sold us on the idea that we can somehow go it alone, or at least live more for ourselves than for others, with no ill effects on our souls. Augmenting this spirit is the kind of de-centralized living made possible by modern mobility. Suburban sprawl, for instance, give the illusion that every person or family is an island onto itself. This is personified in the sometimes fortress-like detached housing we favor in the suburbs. In some “communities” it seems like the only things missing are moats.

Divorce is rampant. Children are growing up with a sense of dislocation and loneliness that sometimes leads to violence (witness the schoolyard shootings that have afflicted America during the past several years). Casual, loveless sex is trumpeted in every form of media and drug and alcohol abuse remain intractable problems in this society.

Affluence adds to the problem as it makes possible the illusion of personal independence. Pre-industrial era life required community out of practical economic necessity. In poor, agricultural cultures co-operation and interdependence were required just to insure that everyone was fed. An aloof life-style was only attainable by very rich individuals, and they were few and far between. Not so today. Ours is the wealthiest society in human history and consumers have easy access to physically life-sustaining products, the acquisition of which is provided for by the labor of someone else, somewhere else. This is unknown in any previous period and it breeds an isolationism that most of us are not even consciously aware of.

To say that the church has been co-opted by the spirit of this age is, unfortunately, an understatement. At one time the church was the center of interdependent community in both urban and rural areas (though the former became less true as the cities grew into the massive megalopolis’s we have come to know today). The idea that an hour and a half Sunday service is the extent of Christian commitment was completely alien to the church during most of its history. Believers lived out their lives corporately and the physical house of worship in a town or village was only a symbol of a communal existence that existed outside its doors. This contrasts with the present day when our churches are often just a place to spend a short time worshipping with people we do not endeavor to further know once the service ends and we go our separate ways.

Meanwhile adultery, divorce, depression, suicide and a number of other human ills that are rampant in the culture at large are becoming ominously more frequent in Evangelical Christianity. We increasingly resemble the world around us and our lack of community is a very basic reason for why it’s happening.

It may well be that the “New Reformation” many Christian thinkers believe must come to the confessing church in the 21st Century will be centered on a very deliberate and counter-cultural rejection of the atomizing tendencies of contemporary culture. Intentional communities are becoming emblematic of the so-called “Ancient-Future Church” as those who sincerely desire to follow Jesus in the West seek to recapture the deep community that was modeled by the earliest Christians. Such experiments in more communal living might strike terror into the hearts of many of us who over-value our independence, but they may well be the only road back to truly life-sustaining relationships in a world that tends to tear apart the human ties that God designed to bind.

Make no mistake about it; Western culture is dying from the disease of Radical Personal Autonomy. Tragically the signs seem to indicate that the church in this part of the world may be dying with it. We who call ourselves a communion of believers must fundamentally re-discover what it means to live not just for God, but also for one another before that happens.

Counting the Cost of Community

Copyright by Shea Oakley
All rights reserved

“The truth is that we want the semblance of community without the risk or the cost. We want to be surrounded by friendly acquaintances, but we don’t want to be entangled, whether in a job, a marriage, or a church.” -Andy Crouch

There is much talk about the need for community in the Church today. In fact the very term “community” has become a buzzword in Evangelical circles. This issue is a legitimate one, for the Church has given in too much to the radical individualism that marks the surrounding culture. The question, though, is not whether we know we need to have more community. The question is, as Crouch bluntly puts it, whether we truly want it. Do we truly want to be invested where we work, faithful in our marriages and committed to one church? Too often the answer, whether admitted or not, is no.

The problem is that you cannot have community without real interdependence and the idea of such interdependence frightens modern Westerners. Why? Because we have bought into the lie that complete personal autonomy is not only desirable, but must be defended at any cost. This is the altar at which western culture worships, and as long as it does Christians embedded in that culture will have a hard time trading such autonomy for genuine community. You cannot have 100% of both simultaneously. It just does not work that way. Community has a price and that price is some of our vaunted individualism.

No one should be surprised that many people rank the word “I’ over “we”, particularly when those people are not believers. What is harder to understand is how Christians who claim to know and live by the Bible can miss the imperative it communicates for Christians to greatly love one another, just as Jesus loves us. Such love is impossible without being deeply invested in each other’s lives. The communion of the saints is an integral part of authentic Christianity. If we are not to a large degree striving to live for each other then we cannot rightly claim to be living for the Lord. All we really need to do to recognize this is to ponder the reality of the Trinity. God exists in permanent, perfect and infinite relationship within Himself. His children need to model their bonds with one another after what exists within the Godhead. Father, Son and Holy Spirit do not keep themselves at a distance from each other, and neither should we.

Of course human bonds will never achieve such perfection on this side of the Eschaton. Even the most committed believers will always have a degree of difficulty surrendering their personal “rights” for the sake of community. Anyone who thinks otherwise does not grasp the relational limitations inherent in our present fallen nature. However, this is not a valid excuse for some of the superficial relationships we see masquerading as the communion of the saints in the Western Church today. Something is very wrong when so many Christians come together for an hour and a half on Sunday mornings and then go their separate ways for the rest of the week.

So the question is how do we fight the alienation from each other that is symptomatic of the worst aspects of Modern and Post-Modern culture? It must begin as so many other things begin in the Christian life, with impassioned prayer. We need to ask for God to show us the blessings of deeper community so that we might develop a thirst for it. We need to petition Him to show us the emptiness and eventual despair that is the lot of those who knowingly or unknowingly worship radical individualism and total personal autonomy. Finally we need to ask our Lord to help us to repent of these two idolatries, not only on behalf of each of us but also for the Body of Christ as a whole. Once we sincerely do this the Lord will reveal to us the practical steps we must take to be more deeply connected to one another. Then progressively, as our holy desire for this unity grows, the Spirit will bind us one-to-another. When (and, unfortunately, if) this begins to happen the “blessed community” will become more of a reality in our churches. The result will be our common good and the glorification of the Name of our God.

Post-Modernism and the Irony of Idolizing the Rational

Copyright  by Shea Oakley

All rights reserved

Rational discourse on the historical proof for the Resurrection and other supernatural events in the life of Christ is of limited value in effecting most conversions. More often what changes lives is a visceral experience of the love of God through his Son. If you ask most Christians why they became children of God they will tell you that the reality of Jesus’ love for them became experientially authentic at a certain moment in their lives. In other words they had a personal encounter with him that forever changed everything.

When Saul was knocked off his horse on the road to Damascus it was not a rational defense of the historicity of the gospel accounts that laid him low both literally and spiritually. The actual presence of the glorified Son of God did that. While it may be true that you must know certain empirical facts about Jesus in order to fully believe in him this proclamation leaves us shaking our heads over accounts of biblically illiterate people on foreign mission fields that recognized Christ for who he was because they had had a encounter with him before missionaries ever cracked open the Bible in front of them. When the missionaries did teach what the scripture says about Jesus these pagans recognized the identity of the One who came to them, sometimes years before his Western representatives did.

Today many Evangelicals are fixated on the rise of Post-Modernism in the first world. They see it as an entirely evil philosophy that denies all objective truth. The anti-Post-Modernist among us will often say that rational, scientific proofs of the absolute truth of the Bible are being abandoned wholesale by a bunch of relativistic philosophers bent on de-legitimizing Christianity. While there is certainly some truth in this charge it is a mistake to assume that the people proffering it are themselves coming from a truly biblical position. In my experience the standard bearers of the war against Post-modernism are sometimes just as captive to Enlightenment-inspired Modernism as their opponents are to contemporary Post-Modernism.

The cardinal assumption of the Modernists was that everything that was truly knowable was accessible by empirical scientific inquiry. The cognitive aspects of human knowledge were virtually deified by the Enlightenment. The mystical and experiential was dismissed as just so much superstition. Whether they are consciously aware of it or not, present day apologists for a purely rational approach to the mysteries of Christianity are offspring of the Enlightenment, a period that caused a huge rejection of supernatural theism by millions of people in the West. This is, to say the least, ironic.

The Hebraic view of God, and thus perhaps the most biblical (as ancient Hebrews, under divine guidance, wrote the Bible) recognizes the inscrutable nature of God and his work in the universe. The Hebraic view is much more interested in experiencing a personal, relational knowledge of God himself than in trying to dissect divine history in the name of systematic theology. We might do well to recognize that some of the Post-Modern stress on experience is closer to the zeitgeist of those who authored the Bible after they had very personal, very powerful encounters with the Lord of the Universe.

The reason this matters is because human beings in the “Post- Industrial”, computerized world of the 21st Century are yearning for something besides scientific evidence to fill Pascal’s “God-shaped hole”. More accurately they are yearning for Someone. We need to introduce them to the God of immediate experience, not just of historical fact, if we hope to lead them away from the “-isms”, whatever they may be, that distract from coming to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. We who presume to evangelize must allow God to touch hearts through our witness for it is our hearts that most desperately need to be captured and transformed by our Savior. In this transformation those hearts often lead. Our brains follow later.